User talk:204.95.150.205

March 2014
Hello, I'm DavidLeighEllis. An edit that you recently made to File:Barack Obama.ogg seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DavidLeighEllis (talk) 04:07, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ford Mustang with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ... disco spinster   talk  04:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Prestonmag. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Cuban missile crisis because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Prestonmag (talk) 15:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2014
Hello, I'm TheCascadian. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Fiserv, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The  Cascadian  23:14, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, 204.95.150.205. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Fiserv, you may have a conflict of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. The  Cascadian  23:15, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2016
Hello. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Microsoft Mobile— because it did not appear to be constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. eurodyne (talk) 19:09, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Sister Mary Elephant
I have a question about an edit made from this IP address; see https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sister_Mary_Elephant&diff=727119504&oldid=710252751 for the edit. I don't know whether the same person is still using this IP address. The edit said that the Cheech & Chong record "Sister Mary Elephant" is the only non-musical spoken word recording to hit the Top 40 of the Billboard Hot 100, cited to Joel Whitburn's The Billboard Book of Top 40 Hits (which was already a citation there before this edit). I have the Whitburn book, and it does not mention that this track is a spoken word recording, much less that it was the only one to hit the Top 40. So I was wondering if you had any verification that it was the only spoken-word recording to hit the Top 40. (I mean, I agree that it is a spoken-word recording, and I agree that it hit the Top 40, but the question is whether it was the only one to do so.) --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)