User talk:205.153.48.25

April 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Free energy suppression has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Free energy suppression was changed by 205.153.48.25 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875447 on 2014-04-05T00:31:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:31, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Acroterion   (talk)   00:33, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Wikipedia is not a free speech platform
See WP:NOTFREESPEECH Jim1138 (talk) 15:22, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Never Say Never (Justin Bieber song) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Never Say Never (Justin Bieber song) was changed by 205.153.48.25 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.91261 on 2014-04-28T22:36:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:36, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Book of Revelation. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:35, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

April 2015
Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to John Kitzhaber, especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 21:21, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Pithecanthropus Erectus (album), please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:
 * If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
 * If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
 * If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. Gyrofrog (talk) 19:59, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2015
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 21:35, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Eduardofeld. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sheila Scott— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. E. Feld talk 21:56, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Red panda ‎. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 22:24, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

October 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Spit Stix has been reverted. Your edit here to Spit Stix was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/spitstixofficial) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:15, 16 October 2016 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please use edit summaries
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting. Thanks! UW Dawgs (talk) 03:44, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Hello, I'm Gluons12. I noticed that in this edit to Colorado–Nebraska football rivalry, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Gluons12 ☢&#124;☕ 23:57, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Madden NFL 17, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 21:24, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Big Game (American football). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You must not make this kind of drastic change to the article unless you first explain it on the talk page and provide Reliable Sources to support the change. MelanieN (talk) 18:48, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I'm adding original research? Apparently, you must not have looked at the results table for the article, because it clearly shows only 110 meetings between Cal and Stanford. Furthermore, don't lie and say I haven't explained my edits, because I clearly did. I stated that the Oregon–Oregon State rivalry has 119 meetings in football. And if you don't believe me, check out the article on the 2016 California Golden Bears football team. When you get to the Stanford game, it shows that Cal's all-time record against Stanford is 43–56–10, not 46–62–11. Why you insist on confusing the record of the Civil War with that of the Big Game is beyond me.
 * This explanation, with references, needs to go on the article's talk page. --MelanieN (talk) 19:00, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * P.S. And you may have trouble proving that the Cal-Stanford game has had only 110 meetings, because:


 * Cal says 2016 was the 119th Big Game.
 * Stanford says 2016 was the 119th Big Game
 * The newspapers say 2016 was the 119th Big Game. --MelanieN (talk) 19:12, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I've figured out the discrepancy. See the article's talk page. --MelanieN (talk) 19:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
Hello, I'm JohnBlackburne. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Elk Hills have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 22:34, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2017
Hello, I'm Anaxial. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Talk:Sea-Monkeys have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Anaxial (talk) 21:17, 13 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2018
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Daniel Paul Schreber, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   21:45, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Hello, I'm Seraphim System. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Brian's Return— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Seraphim System ( talk ) 00:16, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

April 2019
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Amurru kingdom. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 21:05, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to June 21. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Exor674 (talk) 21:55, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Springfield Three. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:40, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello, I'm Bongwarrior. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Archibald Butt have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. --Bongwarrior (talk) 23:49, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

October 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cruise (autonomous vehicle), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ptrnext (talk) 17:43, 12 October 2022 (UTC)