User talk:205.155.154.125

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 20:09, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. While everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your contributions, such as your recent edit to Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, did not appear to be constructive and was automatically reverted by DASHBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * DASHBot produces few false positives, but they do happen. If you believe the bot has reverted your edit wrongly, it is helpful if you report the error so the bot does not make the same mistake again. Please:
 * Click here to submit a false positive report.
 * [ Edit this page] and remove this message.

Thanks, DASHBot Anti-Vandalism (talk) 21:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, I'm Dodger67. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Navy Cross because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Roger (talk) 21:17, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Très Riches Heures
I'm letting your edit stand, but the lead is now somewhat inconsistent with the body of the article, and your edit summary statement is not consistent with Margaret Manion's article in The Dictionary of Art. I left a comment about this on the talk page. --Robert.Allen (talk) 20:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

November 2015
Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Rosa— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU '' ( talk ) 19:57, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SMP0328. (talk) 20:38, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.