User talk:205.202.104.20

Your submission at Articles for creation: WAter bottle chromebook (December 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:WAter bottle chromebook and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:WAter bottle chromebook, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:WAter_bottle_chromebook Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:WAter_bottle_chromebook reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 16:22, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:WAter bottle chromebook


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:WAter bottle chromebook, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 13:13, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm Moops. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to William Black (soldier) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 19:41, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at William Black. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  ❯❯❯  Raydann  (Talk)   19:35, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to William Black, you may be blocked from editing. Tropicalkitty (talk) 19:43, 14 November 2022 (UTC)