User talk:205.210.143.50

Thank you for your input to Kitchener Public Library. Note, however, that much of the content was copied verbatim from the library's webpage; this is a violation of their copyright on that content, and is also considered plagiarism.

I have had to revert the main text of the article. Fell free to contribute aspects of this information again; however, please reword it so that no rights are violated. Thank you again for your efforts. Radagast 19:04, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

November 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Regional Municipality of Waterloo, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Regional Municipality of Waterloo was changed by 205.210.143.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.912079 on 2010-11-19T14:01:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:01, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Kitchener Public Library constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 15:43, 19 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Miles Canyon Basalts was changed by 205.210.143.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.980709 on 2012-11-30T00:16:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:16, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, I'm OluwaCurtis. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tourism in Costa Rica has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. —OluwaCurtis »» (talk to me) 15:45, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your edit at List of most viewed online videos in the first 24 hours
That page is under pending changes protection which means, basically, that your edit had to be approved. It looks like a good start so I approved it even though it's still got issues. Specifically, I'm seeing stuff left over from the Nintendo Switch video that you bumped off the list. Would you please carefully go through your addition and make any adjustments you feel are still needed?  City O f  Silver  17:04, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Kevin Vuong
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kevin Vuong. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CaffeinAddict (talk) 23:20, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

National varieties of English
Hello. In a recent edit to the page Nick Mason, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 21:38, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Cursus honorum—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Granada, Nicaragua, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Felida97 (talk) 21:25, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Glossary of anarchism, you may be blocked from editing. violetwtf (talk) 00:54, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Namespace. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 17:02, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Self-incrimination.  Wesoree  ( Talk ) 17:08, 31 March 2023 (UTC)