User talk:206.110.193.209

February 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Aunt Jemima has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Aunt Jemima was changed by 206.110.193.209 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88942 on 2015-02-13T16:56:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Hello, I'm NicatronTg. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Radon— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Lucas &#34;nicatronTg&#34; Nicodemus (talk) 17:18, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Radon with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Lucas &#34;nicatronTg&#34; Nicodemus (talk) 17:20, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bat-eared fox has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bat-eared fox was changed by 206.110.193.209 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862387 on 2016-01-07T16:49:32+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bat-eared fox. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dger (talk) 17:55, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nissan Silvia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:43, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nissan Silvia was changed by 206.110.193.209 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918857 on 2016-04-14T18:43:11+00:00.

January 2018
Hello, I'm Anaxial. An edit that you recently made to Black Power movement seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Anaxial (talk) 20:38, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2018
Hello, I'm Non-dropframe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Graciela Salicrup— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. — Non-Dropframe    talk  20:47, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Graciela Salicrup. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:14, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Graciela Salicrup was changed by 206.110.193.209 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955728 on 2018-05-18T19:14:31+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Graciela Salicrup, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 19:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Hello, I'm DuncanHill. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bill of Rights 1689 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. DuncanHill (talk) 21:43, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Hello, I'm Flooded with them hundreds. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Osu Castle, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Flooded  with them hundreds 19:11, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to 9000 (number)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 23:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 9000 (number). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Human sacrifice in Maya culture— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:22, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Akan religion have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:47, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Akan religion was changed by 206.110.193.209 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.90159 on 2021-11-19T15:47:19+00:00

January 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pepperoni. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ♥ Th78blue (They/Them/Their • talk) ♥ 20:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)