User talk:206.174.84.23

Vandalism warning
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Nicknack009 (talk) 11:45, 26 April 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Nicknack009 (talk) 21:03, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

I appreciate your concern... comments are in the article's discussion page. The reasons for the content's deletion seem appropriate, as said content is specious as a Cultural depiction. In this case, editing out this type of content does not compromise Wikipedia's integrity.


 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Nicknack009 (talk) 09:18, 28 April 2008 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Question mark blue.png|30px]] Another opinion. I do not believe the above warnings were appropriately issued.  The actions do not appear to be vandalism, but the result of a disagreement between editors.  -- Tcncv (talk) 06:13, 29 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the third opinion. My recent edits to Cultural depictions of Julius Caesar have been in good faith and per WP:VANDALISM are not ascribed as vandalism.  Be assured I'm not deliberately trying to vandalize!  Now what to do about these warnings?206.174.84.23 (talk) 08:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Probably best to keep them together with that third opinion as a record of what has gone on. Nevertheless it would help if your good faith edits would not have the appearance of vandalism (as noticed by the automated revert. Please stay in dialog with the editor(s) that have a different opinion to yours to see if a compromise based op WP policy can be reached. Agathoclea (talk) 10:00, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
 * That was done in error, but reverted back minus the "Rumours" and "References". I won't edit it anymore until there's a compromise.

Cultural depictions of Julius Caesar
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Cultural depictions of Julius Caesar. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Agathoclea (talk) 05:32, 29 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Dispute resolution is a noble course of action, which I'll take either here or the article's discussion page. My arguments seem to have fallen on deaf ears though.206.174.84.23 (talk) 08:39, 29 April 2008 (UTC)