User talk:206.198.189.71

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kathleen Hicks, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. KidAd  talk  20:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
Your recent editing history at Kathleen Hicks shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CUPIDICAE💕 20:35, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. CUPIDICAE💕 20:39, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * You've been reverted by numerous editors. go read WP:BLPPRIVACY and WP:BLP which also states that you cannot restore contested content without consensus. Which you've not gotten because you refuse to engage in a discussion and instead are on a reverting spree. CUPIDICAE💕  20:41, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GeneralNotability (talk) 20:55, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 * You just got off a block for edit warring on Kathleen Hicks. Stop reinstating the material and engage on the talk page where there is an active discussion and gain consensus. As per our BLP policy, you cannot restore contested material without consensus. CUPIDICAE💕  14:35, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. CUPIDICAE💕 14:48, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Seriously, would you stop edit warring over BLP violations?! You have been blocked at least twice for this. Do you want to keep that streak going? We do not need every trivial detail about living people, particularly those that ARE NOT DISCUSSED IN SOURCES. CUPIDICAE💕  15:02, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
 Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Kathleen Hicks) for a period of 1 week for edit warring. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. GeneralNotability (talk) 15:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)