User talk:206.224.253.108

September 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rosie the Riveter. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Rosie the Riveter was changed by 206.224.253.108 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.900485 on 2017-09-15T16:53:42+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rosie the Riveter, you may be blocked from editing. Tompop888 (talk) (contribs) 16:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rosie the Riveter. Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:55, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Henutsen— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:25, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

May 2019
Hello, I'm Gilliam. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. – Gilliam (talk) 16:34, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Second Intermediate Period of Egypt has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:14, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Second Intermediate Period of Egypt was changed by 206.224.253.108 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903899 on 2019-05-17T16:14:27+00:00

December 2019
Hello, I'm Anaxial. I noticed that you recently removed content from Women in ancient Egypt without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Anaxial (talk) 20:49, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Duy Tran


Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Draft:Duy Tran, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. IdreamofJeanie (talk) 19:05, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, I'm AeschyIus. I noticed that in this edit to Giant golden-crowned flying fox, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. aeschyIus (talk) 20:46, 20 April 2021 (UTC)