User talk:206.57.251.55

April 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at George Armstrong Custer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. aboideautalk 18:52, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome!
Hello! I've seen some of your edits, and I really appreciate the contributions you're making to Wikipedia. I'm glad you're helping the project! You may wish to consider creating an account. It's quick, free, and anonymous (you don't have to give away any real-world information about yourself).

When you're logged in, you can do many things that unregistered users cannot, such as creating new pages, uploading images, and keeping track of changes to articles you edit frequently. It helps the community, too &mdash; Wikipedians will be more likely to remember who you are when you have an account name! If you would like to check if a username is available, you can go here.

If you want more information on the benefits of creating an account, click here. And once you've registered, please drop me a message and say hi! Don't forget to sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ). --David Tornheim (talk) 19:03, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Custer
When you don't get your way, do not keep reverting. Instead discuss on the talk page of the article. Do not WP:EDITWAR. You can be blocked for edit-warring. Please read WP:BRD, which explains what happens when your suggested changes are opposed and how your can proceed and try to find support for your change. --David Tornheim (talk) 18:40, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on George Armstrong Custer; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --David Tornheim (talk) 18:42, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.