User talk:206.78.51.132

March 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rhynchonella has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:44, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rhynchonella was changed by 206.78.51.132 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.933923 on 2019-03-25T15:44:39+00:00

May 2019
Hello, I'm TheDoDahMan. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Maple syrup urine disease have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. TheDoDahMan (talk) 19:20, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Pac-Man—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 19:04, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Fealty. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you.  Y.  ssk  16:42, 24 August 2021 (UTC)