User talk:206.84.170.18

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 206.84.170.18, has made edits to Khatam an-Nabiyyin that do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider [ getting a username] to avoid confusion with other editors. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:
 * Help contents – the main help page.
 * Quick guide – a "cheatsheet" listing the main editing commands.
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Pepper Beast   (talk)  13:21, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Khatam an-Nabiyyin, you may be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 16:04, 3 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The problem is with neutral belief. My dear author, If someone posts that day and night are the same and i correct them. Would that be violating your rules or would it be neutral. When you are writing about something or someone, it is essential to know about essence. The problem is that u dont what is neutral in this situation because you are siding with the Ahmadiya rather being neutal. 206.84.170.18 (talk) 16:23, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
 * No, the problem is not with "neutral belief", it's with your belief--that Ahmadiyya is somehow not a "valid" form of Islam. You are entitled to that opinion, and spread it on Facebook or TikTok all you like, but this is not the place for it. And that I'm siding with them because I'm trying to uphold WP:NPOV is just ridiculous. Continue and you will be blocked. Drmies (talk) 16:33, 3 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Yes it is not a valid form ozf islam because it is in the definition of islam to believe in finality of prophet Muhammad, which they have willfully mould for their own purposes. Try to threaten someone else with these threats of getting blocked. So much of right to speak but where is the right to have the right information brother. If u want to write their version, they do write with it that they mainstream do not believe that they are part of islam. That is what a neutral argument should look like. You are basically committing a fallacy by allowimg them spread misinformation. 206.84.170.18 (talk) 19:35, 3 February 2022 (UTC)


 * You are compromising the very rule you are stating. You have the policy to inform and not influence people's views. Right?

Then this Ahmiddiya part is even violating this. A neutral perspective of informing the people would include that the mainstream does not believe that Ahmaddiya are part of islam. Cheers. 206.84.170.18 (talk) 19:40, 3 February 2022 (UTC)