User talk:207.126.95.2

Welcome!
Hello, 207.126.95.2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

January 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Abortion in New Zealand. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abortion_in_New_Zealand&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. James500 (talk) 08:05, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pigface. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NJZombie (talk) 11:58, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: MD5 was changed by 207.126.95.2 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.976769 on 2012-11-09T08:17:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:17, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Everland. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Gareth Griffith-Jones / The Welsh Buzzard 19:23, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2013
Hello, I'm Seaphoto. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Myles Standish, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Sea photo Talk  07:18, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Roda Antar, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 18:16, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Grasshopper, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:35, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm Mark Arsten. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Turmeric, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:50, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, Mark. Unfortunately, it appears that the NIH's statement re: turmeric is nonconstructive and misleading and thus not appropriate for the turmeric article. I suggest you peruse the hundreds of clinical studies that have been conducted on turmeric, invalidating their statement that few studies have been conducted.