User talk:207.157.134.158

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Moore's law, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ~  Baron Von Yiffington . talk. contribs 22:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Samuel Slater, you will be blocked from editing. Jhbuk (talk) 18:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:17, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 Months for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.  Ron h jones (Talk) 21:20, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I'm concerned for several reasons. First, we don't have any way to know that you are indeed the technology coordinator for the school, and not the student who was vandalizing the encyclopedia just before this block was created today. Second, unblocking this ip would not only allow your students to edit anonymously, but would also allow the other vandalism to continue. Third, if all of your students are editing anonymously from the same ip address, you will not be able to evaluate their work, nor will you be able to identify which students choose to use their access for more vandalism (as some of them inevitably will). Fourth, my experience is that the majority of junior high school students do not have the writing skills yet that are necessary to do the high-quality research writing that Wikipedia requires- it's true that many universities have made Wikipedia editing a successful part of their studies, but university students have writing skills that 12-year-olds often lack. Fifth, your plan to have the students write about "various landmarks" has certain flaws; the notability criteria may become an issue in your proposed assignment. An alternate assignment might be to have students find information on Wikipedia, rather than adding to it, or perhaps they could create a community web site with information about various local landmarks using technology that is approved by your network. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:24, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If you want your students to edit in such a manner, perhaps you should install Wiki software on your own network. Then you can create some pages for your students to use - and get them to write their own pages. This will allow your students to complete any "Wiki" projects which they need to - and you can then decide for yourself on whether the students have shown the required level - as FisherQueen points out, to do this on Wikipedia would not be beneficial to Wikipedia. With your own Wiki, you can assign local usernames (I'm sure the board won't object to that, as it would only be used in-house). --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 23:35, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If you still consider that your students can make useful articles, then you can always arrange to make accounts for each of them (WP:ACCOUNT). Then they will be able to edit from school - it's only anonymous editing that is blocked. BUT, should a single one of them get blocked, then that will start the autoblock process, which is likely to end up blocking every account that uses this IP address.  Ron h jones (Talk) 20:19, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at It Happened One Night, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bzuk (talk) 17:39, 18 October 2011 (UTC).

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:16, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

May 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.  Rob van  vee  17:20, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Bobcat. RA talkcontribs 17:33, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Red Scare, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 15:20, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Hello, I'm Snow Blizzard. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Cerium that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Snow  Blizzard  17:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cuisine of the Southern United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Flyer22 (talk) 16:59, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. JNW (talk) 15:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your edits to Robert Lowell
Hello, I'm My name is not dave. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Robert Lowell that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. My name is not dave (talk/contribs) 18:46, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Rust v. Sullivan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. BitBus  Talk   16:34, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2017
Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Old Spanish Trail (auto trail)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 21:00, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

May 2017
Hello, I'm -glove-. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Cambrian explosion— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -glove- (talk) 19:58, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Brian Dannelly—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:24, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Brian Dannelly. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 18:25, 15 September 2021 (UTC)