User talk:207.161.83.87

MOS:ERA
Please observe it. Your edits are becoming disruptive and will be approached as such from now on. Thank you. El_C 23:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. El_C 23:42, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Whether they're "typoes" is not the point
Hi 207.161.83.87. I note above that both you and the reviewing administrators seem to be fixating on the word "typo". But whether you think you're correcting "typoes" or not is really not the point. The point is that the established guideline is that both styles, BC/AD and BCE/CE, are acceptable, and articles should not be changed from one to the other without obtaining consensus on the talk page. If you don't agree with that, well, there are lots of folks who agree with you, and you can always try to get it changed (but be aware that it's a recurring discussion and people get tired of litigating it over and over again, so they may be cranky). What you can't do, at least for long, is just ignore the guideline and try to impose your own standard on Wikipedia. --Trovatore (talk) 20:42, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for a well-thought response! :)
Hi Trovatore, thank you so much for a response that looks at what I was being confused by. I certainly appreciate hearing from people who can objectively give some reasons as well as helpful advice on the matter. I actually had no idea what the MOS:ERA even was, so a little guidance would have been nice from Yamla. Being a first-time editor on Wikipedia, I was hoping for a more positive experience and was quite sullied by Yamla. So I appreciate your addition to my talk page, Trovatore, as well as your perspective.