User talk:207.183.181.238

June 2024
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Spalding–Rigdon theory of Book of Mormon authorship, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. SmittenGalaxy (talk) 15:42, 28 June 2024 (UTC)


 * re: Those weren't weasel words or editorialising; quoting experts who give their own editorial opinions isn't editorialising, it's a bedrock of Wikipedia writing, as is laid out very explicitly in policy. And "most historians" isn't  weasel words, it's a description of academic consensus. If your contention is that academic consensus doesn't exist, that's a separate issue, but you need to say that that's your contention (rather than objecting to the very idea that academic consensus can exist) and back it up with some evidence. -- AntiDionysius  ( talk ) 15:52, 28 June 2024 (UTC)