User talk:207.191.157.40

April 2021
Hello, I'm HelenDegenerate. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Brooklyn Center, Minnesota seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. HelenDegenerate (talk) 01:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm CodingCyclone. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Brooklyn Center, Minnesota have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. ''The first edit - the larger one - was fine upon closer inspection, however, adding that someone was part of the KKK needs to have a source backing it up. I'm sorry about initially reverting both edits, however, the second could be construed as disruptive.'' CodingCyclone!  🌀 📘 01:07, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Re: your message
Hello, IP user. I see you pinged me on my talk page. Thank you so much for contacting me about this. The reason that I reverted your edit, the one that said “The death has been ruled a homicide and the police claim that the shooter confused a gun with a stun weapon weighing about 1/3 as much”, is not because I thought it was false, but because of how it was phrased. The phrasing sounded just a tad hostile towards the officer, which is why I reverted it. But now, looking at your other contributions to this page, I see that it wasn’t your intention to do that. I am sorry for reverting it, I hope you’ll forgive me. HelenDegenerate (talk) 20:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

I'm sorry you find history disruptive. It was all fine on closer inspection. Shouldn't all inspection be close inspection? They were nowhere near defamatory or libelous. For one thing, being 100% true eliminates the possibility of either one. I assume you are not very familiar with US law.

And now it's worse and more racist than ever. And locked. After I provided the citation you asked for, which you could have found yourself considering it was written literally yesterday. So well done there.

So much for trying to add some measure of balance and accuracy to a whitewashed history of a racist town. I guess what I'm learning is that this is a racist site also.

Yeah wonder why you don't have any response now.