User talk:207.229.77.92

This is not an edit war. IM right and have provided proof. Vaxart has received NO funding from OWS. Neither has inovio. What other proof besides OWS 's own filings do you need? https://www.hhs.gov/coronavirus/explaining-operation-warp-speed/index.html this is who has recieved funding. and is apart of OWS. Note inovio and vaxart are not on is. Direct From HHS

https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2020/06/16/fact-sheet-explaining-operation-warp-speed.html

September 2020
Your recent editing history at Operation Warp Speed shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''The talk page is available for discussing this, but you prefer to edit war without explanation. Final warning before you are reported to admin for a block.'' Zefr (talk) 17:26, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Megan☺️  Talk to the monster  13:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

"INcorrect information" You mean where HHS says Vaxart is NOT apart of OWS? That kind of incorrect information? Where they are being suyed for LYING about being part of OWS? That kind of incorrect information? At least know what youre talking about before making YOUR false claims. Block me if you wish. Doesnt change that every time you allow VAXART to be labeled as part of OWS you are contributing to a blatant lie.

October 2020
So its considered vandalizing a page by removing PROVEN inaccuracies?

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Operation Warp Speed. Zefr (talk) 19:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.