User talk:207.235.150.113

February 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Gorsha Sur, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:34, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm Eviolite. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to John Donahoe—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ev iolite  (talk)  18:21, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Donahoe. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:30, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: John Donahoe was changed by 207.235.150.113 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891348 on 2022-03-28T18:30:21+00:00

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sssssss, you may be blocked from editing. Dirkbb (talk) 19:24, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Julian Serrano. Dirkbb (talk) 19:27, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello, I'm FozzieHey. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Ronald L. Smith—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. FozzieHey (talk) 19:34, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ronald L. Smith. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. >>> Ingenuity . talk ; 14:16, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

August 2022
Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to John Donahoe have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. &mdash; Ingenuity (talk &bull; contribs) 18:45, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to John Donahoe—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Hey man im josh (talk) 18:13, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Nick Diaz. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:28, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nick Diaz. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 15:29, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nick Diaz, you may be blocked from editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:32, 19 September 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Nick Diaz. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:34, 19 September 2022 (UTC)