User talk:207.250.21.32

2005
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --JoanneB 20:09, 28 September 2005 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --D-Day 22:35, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

January 2006

 * 1) Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.  &#160;—  The KMan  talk   21:39, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
 * 2) Thanks for experimenting with the page Tupac Shakur on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.  Thanks. Hall Monitor 21:28, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to God in a Pill?, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: God in a Pill? was changed by 207.250.21.32 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-10-15T18:59:08+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 18:59, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

January 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Nat Turner. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 22:58, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Pinethicket (talk) 20:59, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fanny Zilch


The article Fanny Zilch has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence this fictional character passes WP:NFICTION/GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:13, 9 February 2020 (UTC)