User talk:207.30.62.198

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Hematocrit has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Dougofborg (talk) 15:28, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

November 2009
Do you have a source for your statement about the visibility of the signal flags being a reason for the bridge decision? If not, then I'll delete your statement.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:23, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Education in the Philippines, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Education in the Philippines was changed by 207.30.62.198 (u) (t) making a minor change adding "!!!" on 2009-12-02T23:05:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Education in the Philippines. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 23:06, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Good catch
— Ed   (talk  •  majestic titan)  04:16, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Omega Delta Sigma, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Omega Delta Sigma was changed by 207.30.62.198 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-02-13T13:50:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 13:50, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Noble gas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 16:41, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Cyberculture has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  14:04, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Virtual world. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you.  Wayne Olajuwon  chat   14:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Online chat. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  Wayne Olajuwon  chat   14:06, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Electronic commerce. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without  further notice. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  14:07, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 14:11, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

vandalisim from this IP address
I am using a computer that shares an IP address with other machines that are available to some less mature users. Although THIS user does not engage in vandalism, I realize that you must treat this IP Address according to whatever comes from it, and so I would understand if this address ends up being banned. I just pray that my less mature colleagues will come to realize that what they are doing is not nearly as hilarious as they think it is.

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Saint Leo University, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Arthena(talk) 17:33, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your suggestion on Homer
Semi protected pages, such as Homer and Julius Caesar, are available to confirmed users for editing four days, plus ten contributions, after registering. Absolutely no compulsion at all, but the standard exhortation from the management to do so is here. All the best. --Old Moonraker (talk) 22:15, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

November 2012
Hello, I'm Skamecrazy123. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Provadia, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Skamecrazy123 (talk) 17:14, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Provadia with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oxfordwang (talk) 17:17, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

February 2013
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Educational attainment in the United States, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Harlem Baker Hughes (talk) 00:35, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2013
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to New York Jets because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 17:52, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2014
Hello, I'm Rhinestone K. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mind because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Rhinestone K (talk) 14:51, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=693587914 your edit] to Supersessionism may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:27, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
 * on Israel and the Church: The Question of Supersessionism in the Theology of Thomas Aquinas. Pickwick/Wipf &amp; Stock, 2014. 1st chapter: [https://www.academia.edu/8082908/Aquinas_on_Israel_

February 2017
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Qatar Airways, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer $Talk$ 15:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.