User talk:208.104.49.81

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (talk page) (Contribs) Remember to notify me after replying off my talk page. 01:54, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Church of Saint-Maclou has been reverted. Your edit here to Church of Saint-Maclou was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G24p-6k8Ods) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. music or video) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 21:31, 25 June 2020 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Good article review
Thanks for your message; it's been pleasant collaborating with you, and you're making good edits. It might be early to ask for a good article review; usually articles have been up for quite a while before they're reviewed, but I don't think it would hurt. They can offer some good specific advice on what further work might be needed. Cordially, SiefkinDR (talk) 08:37, 27 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Don't be discouraged by JohnBod's criticism of the article.  He's an excellent editor, though he's a little grumpy. We need to see that the tags are removed, the references are solid and then try again. It usually takes a good while and a lot of review to reach good article status, but it can get there.   Cordially, SiefkinDR (talk) 20:19, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Please look at a new article
I've been doing a new article, Early Gothic architecture, which you might find interesting. I would welcome your thoughts and contributions. Cordially, SiefkinDR (talk) 09:57, 29 June 2020 (UTC)