User talk:208.125.139.18

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Esrever (klaT) 15:51, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Braingle (talk) 19:31, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The recent edit you made to Joe DiMaggio constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Chasingsol(talk) 19:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Curse of the Bambino has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy gabs adds 14:58, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
The recent edit you made to the page Roman army constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. -- Menti  fisto  01:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page No-fault divorce has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. KuroiShiroi (contribs) 00:44, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Ann Dunham
Your edits were reverted as unsourced POV, however I believe you were deliberately trolling. Anyone who thinks Unitarians are radical Marxists is either one fry short of a happy meal or trying to cause trouble. Perhaps you should actually read your bible for the first time, rather than trying to hit people over the head with it. Viriditas (talk) 03:36, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but I think that you fail to realize that these are unbiased facts about Ann Dunham. The church, which you can clearly look up, was referred to as, "the small red church on the hill," and Dunham's high school was highly known for its Marxist leanings. It frustrates me that anytime I try to post facts, such as these, wikipedia just bashes them and gets rid of them. I would like to have a discussion about this outside of these parameters and in a less formal setting. Please contact me by email: yankeefreak127@aim.com. Additionally, yankeefreak127 is my AIM address. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.125.139.18 (talk) 03:51, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The article is a biography about Ann Dunham, not about criticism of the food she ate or the establishments she patronized. If you have good, solid sources for your additions, let's see them, otherwise it appears you are engaging in WP:COATRACKING to demonize Dunham.  I do not think it is important to criticize Unitarians or to cite testimony from the House Un-American Activities Committee, which Truman rightly called the "most un-American thing in the country today." Viriditas (talk) 04:00, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * If I were to leave citations, would my additions be kept? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.125.139.18 (talk) 05:01, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * That isn't how it works. First, show me the citations you are using. Viriditas (talk) 09:32, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Then why is that when I look at an article, such as that of Zell Miller, it seems that, especially in the middle section about his RNC speech, there is an attempted smear with use of factual evidence? Why is it that in this article it is permitted to use factual evidence to smear someone and not permitted in the Ann Dunham article?


 * Clearly, the point of wikipedia in terms of specific people, is to briefly reveal who people are. That is done well in the article about Zell Miller, clearly depicting him as a DINO, yet you seem to not permit that in the Ann Dunham article when there are numerous sources that clearly state that not only her church, but also her school had Marxist leanings. What simply angers me about what you continually do with my edits is that you do not let me keep a fact, such is that John Stenhouse was remarked to have said that he was a member of the Communist Party USA. That is a fact and not a biased statement!


 * Here are a couple of Zell Miller quotes I thought that you should see that clearly reveal who he is: a DINO.


 * "Miller appeared in an interview with Chris Matthews on the MSNBC show Hardball. Here, Miller became visibly angry."


 * "Matthews pressed Miller with the question "Do you believe now – do you believe, Senator, truthfully, that John Kerry wants to defend the country with spitballs?" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.125.139.18 (talk) 21:55, 5 March 2010 (UTC)


 * What source citations are you using? Please provide author names, source titles, and dates, or links if you like. Viriditas (talk) 02:39, 6 March 2010 (UTC)


 * With Zell Miller, I'm referring to what is written on the wikipedia page.


 * Essentially, my point is that there is a clear attempt at a smear towards Zell Miller in his article with the use of factual evidence, whereas whenever I attempt to put facts into the Ann Dunham article, you just remove them.


 * Secondly, I edited the Brecht Forum article and changed the word, "left" to "left-wing." If you change this back to left, it is clear that wikipedia has fallen to the bias of the media. The organization is Marxist (which is even shown on the front page of their website with pride) for god sake, and it is a non-biased fact to call them left-wing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.10.64.194 (talk) 04:54, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Could you answer my questions, please? Viriditas (talk) 08:12, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I did. I said that the information of Zell Miller came directly from his page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.125.139.18 (talk) 17:18, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'll take a look at it and get back to you. Let's keep the discussion in one place. Viriditas (talk) 02:59, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 21:56, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

May 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Legends of the Hidden Temple has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Hús ö  nd  00:07, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Referee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 17:34, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

July 2010
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Berkshire School, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Orlady (talk) 15:57, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Berkshire School, you may be blocked from editing. --Orlady (talk) 15:21, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

August 2010
This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Berkshire School, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Orlady (talk) 22:14, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Reply: You do realize that an entire school is on this IP Address and what you just posted is viewable by a community of over 450 people. I didn't delete the text on this page and yet I received this message.

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Brahman, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Moloch09 (talk) 16:03, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shays' Rebellion. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 01:38, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Jewish principles of faith has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Slon02 (talk) 00:36, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Jewish principles of faith. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Slon02 (talk) 00:40, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

March 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Guitarfish has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Harry (talk) 20:46, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Berkshire School, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. --some jerk on the Internet   (talk)  17:43, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Fluffernutter. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Berkshire School with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 16:50, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Berkshire School, you may be blocked from editing. Orlady (talk) 19:42, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Averill Park Central School District. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Averill_Park_Central_School_District&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TerriersFan (talk) 16:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cornwall, Connecticut. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ─═Klilidiplomus █ Talk═─ 16:49, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Cornwall, Connecticut with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Calabe1992 16:50, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Cornwall, Connecticut. Calabe1992 16:52, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:55, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Black Sox Scandal, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Willdude123&#124;Ƹ21ɘbublliW (talk) 13:51, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Berkshire School with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan653 (talk) 20:21, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

February 2013
Hello, I'm Avoided. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Macbeth, King of Scotland, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Avoided (talk) 16:10, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Recent edits to Drop Dead Gorgeous (film)
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Technopat (talk) 23:50, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Boone Logan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:39, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2014
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at William Bullock (inventor), you may be blocked from editing. Dudel250 (talk) 02:06, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2014
Hello, I'm HelloThereMinions. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Chicago Bulls seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. HelloThereMinions talk, contribs 14:45, 13 December 2014 (UTC)