User talk:208.253.107.22

November 2021
Hello, I'm BilCat. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Boeing KC-46 Pegasus, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 07:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at McDonnell Douglas KC-10 Extender, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 08:26, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you recently removed content from Boeing KC-46 Pegasus without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. ''Do not remove needed sections like References. Slow down and be more careful.'' Regards, -Fnlayson (talk) 15:32, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Boeing KC-46 Pegasus has been reverted. Your edit here to Boeing KC-46 Pegasus was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://mobile.twitter.com/BoeingDefense/status/1458113579706683398, https://mobile.twitter.com/97AMW/status/1446518500722450438) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:02, 17 November 2021 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

You're on thin ice
the policy page [WP:EDITWAR] mentions a rule called the three-revert rule. you are close to violating it, having made 3 reverts in the past 24 hours on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_KC-46_Pegasus. Your actions do also seem to constitute an edit war. 50.206.151.146 (talk) 17:35, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 50.206.151.146 (talk) 18:07, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Boeing_KC-46_Pegasus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

50.206.151.146 (talk) 18:15, 17 November 2021 (UTC)