User talk:208.28.117.34

April 2007
Your recent edit to Richard Speck (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 18:15, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

June 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. -NatureBoyMD (talk) 18:01, 19 June 2008 (UTC)

October 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marmite. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:15, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Danielle Staub, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=489092087 here]. Widefox (talk) 02:20, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

August 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at American bison. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dger (talk) 14:00, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm DavidLeighEllis. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Dakota Fanning because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DavidLeighEllis (talk) 21:11, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * Information.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Amy Adams. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. -- Brangifer (talk) 04:41, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

September 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at It (miniseries). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 18:12, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Chris Stedman, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:11, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   15:12, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chris Stedman, you may be blocked from editing. Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 15:16, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to 2017 NFL season. Shellwood (talk) 21:01, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

National varieties of English
In a recent edit to the page Schuylkill Mall, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand or Ireland, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 00:58, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2019
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rachel Weisz have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 17:17, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Rutland Massachusetts January 24 2017 Edit
Hi, on January 24 2017 you made an edit to my hometown's wikipedia page stating "Scott Bakula is slated to perform a spoken-word piece at the 2017 celebration." I was wondering where this information came from, or if you have any sources about this. There is no news about this anywhere on the internet I can find, and no one I've talked to heard about it. I'm extremely curious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Demman32 (talk • contribs) 01:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Please see the note at the top of this page. The IP address associated with this talk page is likely used by a large number of users. It is very unlikely that whomever added that questionable claim 3 years ago is reading this. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 02:01, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I am deep in a mystery, summerphd. Do you have a relation to this IP?
 * Back on 21 December 2017, I reverted one of their edits. That added this talk page to my watch list. That's it.
 * You are unlikely to figure out if that 2017 edit was hearsay, insider information or mere vandalism at this late date. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 02:49, 30 March 2020 (UTC)