User talk:208.38.59.161

April 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Fine Living (Canada) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks.  Staffwaterboy  Talk ♂ 21:59, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Wildthing61476 (talk) 21:19, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Deor (talk) 01:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to List of empires. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. DougsTech (talk) 01:16, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:


 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but you may wish to  [ create an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits. If you edit without a username, your IP address is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page. Again, welcome! DougsTech (talk) 02:53, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. — Archon Magnus (Talk 19:58, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

April 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Manila has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Ray Talk 22:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Manila. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps 22:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Tim Vickers (talk) 01:13, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 1976 swine flu outbreak, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Burner 0718  JibbaJabba!  19:00, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Sapperbdl. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. neko-chan :3 (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User:Sapperbdl. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. User:Marek69. 00:02, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tennessee, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Immunize (talk) 19:12, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2010
Your recent edit to the page Rexall Place appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 19:01, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from User talk:208.38.59.163. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 17:36, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cough, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:30, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Ryan Nugent-Hopkins
Ryan is not commonly referred to by a nickname as you have edited on his article. Please before making these kind of changes use the talk page to discuss with other editors. Nicknames are not placed in the lead unless he is known more by his nickname than his real name. FYI I have heard the nickname RNH more than the nickname 'the nuge'. Also if you notice on Ryan Smyth's page he is not commonly referred to as Smitty or Hemsky is not referred to as Hemmer for the same reasons. Again please don't edit the page without discussion from your fellow editors. Karl 334  ☞ TALK to ME ☜  21:37, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Resolute 21:50, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Chlorophyll, you may be blocked from editing. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:00, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Kaitlyn (wrestler)
Now you are just deleting my cited sources of Kaitlyn's moves. I had it well cited just like the bodyscissors move because I am the one who added all of those moves including two of the finishers, which are also well cited. So I am going to ask one last time to stop deleting my sources and moves or I will file a complaint on you for vandelism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hemmeband17 (talk • contribs) 20:59, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually what you're doing (actually the undone edit was someone else, unless you're admitting to engaging in sockpuppetry?) is what could be considered vandalism (I would classify them as bad "good faith" edits personally). BLP (actually WP on the whole, but BLP especially) requires reliably sourced material (ie, not just any website) and the WP:PW group wants to limit the number of sig moves. Not every move a wrestler does is considered a "signature move", someone as inexperienced as Kaitlyn doesn't have as many as Cena. Check out WP:PW/MOS, feel free to bring this up with the PW group if you think I'm still in the wrong. --208.38.59.161 (talk) 21:08, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ridernyc (talk) 00:17, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Cool! What are we edit warring over? I'm not the person who did it, though I appear to be the IP. If you're going to tar and feather me, can I at least see what I'm accused of? Call it morbid curiosity... 208.38.59.161 (talk) 02:31, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

June 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is invited to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to As Long as You Love Me, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jprg1966  (talk)  20:16, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Alapalooza
Unless you have a reliable source that explicitly states that "Traffic Jam" is a style parody of Prince's Let's Go Crazy, please do not keep adding that information to the Alapalooza article, as it will be reverted. Per Wikipedia's policies on verifiability, all information that could be challenged must be referenced with reliable sources, even if it sounds almost certain that a certain song may be a style influence on another. It must be sourced. Canadian  Paul  13:51, 21 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Last.fm does not meet the definition of a reliable source, because it consists of user-generated content. Please see Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 57 as well. Unless there's a source that explicitly links Yankovic to some sort of claim that that is the song he based "Traffic Jam" off of, then the connection is mere speculation and is not verifiable. Canadian   Paul  19:00, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Chick-fil-A‎
Note that including claims from one company that another company is putting out products hazardous to children really needs some strong sourcing. -- The Red Pen of Doom  23:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Kaitlyn
All those resources you've deleted over twenty reliable resources not only from me, but from others too. They are perfectly cited and should stay on the page, and if it wasn't reliable or true, I would understand the deletions, but they are. I would and the others would appreciate if you wouldn't delete such resources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.176.3.213 (talk) 05:29, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Krassibsb
XXBTJ7B38H67LML7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.251.127.30 (talk) 23:13, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

February 2013
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to James L. Kraft does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! Dawnseeker2000  00:15, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020
Hello, I'm Money emoji. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Louis Domingue have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Money emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 20:32, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2023
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Westmount Centre, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Meters (talk) 03:53, 19 December 2023 (UTC)