User talk:208.68.154.145

February 2008
Your recent edit to Growth hormone (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 21:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. JoJan (talk) 17:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

April 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Dawn bard (talk) 14:36, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to ASCII art has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  abf  /talk to me/  21:39, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

December 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on Candy cane worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. User:Marek69User_talk:Marek69 19:30, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Eggnog constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Faradayplank (talk) 19:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Copyright violations
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. Deli nk (talk) 21:47, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Killeroid (talk) 19:38, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Killeroid (talk) 20:12, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

February 2009
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. - gadfium 20:44, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Emperor Renzong of Song has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Until It Sleeps Talk •  Contribs 13:39, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

January 2010
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 17:08, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

September 2011
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tropical savanna climate, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tropical savanna climate was changed by 208.68.154.145 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950477 on 2011-09-14T14:04:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:05, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tropical savanna climate with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Marek. 69  talk  14:28, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Coercive monopoly. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:26, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

January 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Alvin and the Chipmunks, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Alvin and the Chipmunks was changed by 208.68.154.145 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97315 on 2012-01-12T15:11:27+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:11, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 22:30, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

February 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Culture of Samoa, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Culture of Samoa was changed by 208.68.154.145 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960002 on 2012-02-06T17:19:51+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:19, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Phil Knight. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Phil_Knight&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  City O f  Silver  16:06, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 22:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

April 2013
Hello, I'm Tolly4bolly. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Stage lighting, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Tolly  4  bolly  16:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Vanadium, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 15:34, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vanadium with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Dan653 (talk) 15:35, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Vanadium with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 15:47, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Hello, I'm Glaisher. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Geisha because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Glaisher  [talk]  16:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. gadfium 21:10, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

October 2014
Hello, I'm Technopat. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Catholic Church because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Technopat (talk) 15:23, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2015
Hello, I'm Bongwarrior. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Wildfire because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Bongwarrior (talk) 19:02, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wildfire, you may be blocked from editing. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 20:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Habitat destruction. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Gap9551 (talk) 19:15, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Habitat destruction, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 19:17, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Habitat destruction. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Habitat destruction was changed by 208.68.154.145 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903665 on 2016-10-14T19:20:13+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:20, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

March 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Period (periodic table) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:33, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Period (periodic table) was changed by 208.68.154.145 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897576 on 2018-03-21T18:33:43+00:00.

October 2020
Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 18:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)