User talk:208.94.131.48

April 2015
Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Urreligion— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  17:25, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel Boone. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yamaguchi%E5%85%88%E7%94%9F&action=edit&amp;section=new Yamaguchi先生] 19:32, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel Boone, you may be blocked from editing. [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yamaguchi%E5%85%88%E7%94%9F&action=edit&amp;section=new Yamaguchi先生] 19:37, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2020
Hello, I'm Dylsss. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to McKinney Independent School District have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Dylsss(talk contribs) 18:32, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making (or attempting to make) disruptive edits that repeatedly triggered the edit filter. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 18:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Socratic method have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:26, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Socratic method was changed by 208.94.131.48 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955429 on 2021-01-11T17:26:29+00:00

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Socratic method. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Ahmetlii (talk) 17:27, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Cry of Dolores, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Leonidlednev (talk) 14:06, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cry of Dolores. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:21, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Cry of Dolores was changed by 208.94.131.48 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2021-09-29T14:21:18+00:00