User talk:209.10.150.34

User:Wes sideman
Page:

User being reported:

Previous version reverted to: before last revert

Diffs of the user's reverts:
 * 1)
 * 2)
 * 3)
 * 4)
 * 5)  completely disregarded Secretname101 hard work on lead

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:   

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page:

Comments: in addition to this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:EdJohnston#Wes_Sideman_Abuse_of_Power Ironically, in a completely unrelated matter, Please be informed that wes sideman is again causing problems and edit warring another article about Klete Keller. (@Wes sideman: You need to stop now. When you point a finger at another, you point four at yourself. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:32, 9 November 2022 (UTC)) - It seems to be a pattern. He was warned by another admin @Deepfriedokra: and he recommended to block him (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Deepfriedokra&diff=next&oldid=1120943837), As the previous complaint here states he falsified information to his liking and monitors and harasses. As he did with the Chad Johnson page, he becomes obsessed and does not want any remotely good press, even edit warring over the simple order in the lead of Klete Keller's impressive USA Olympic gold medal accomplishments BEFORE his minor participation in Jan 6. Another respected editor (SecretName101) clearly stated her case of the correct order in which the lead should be: "This being said, as far as the lead sentence, it seems pretty clear to me that it should mention that he is a swimmer first, then that he committed a crime. SecretName101 (talk) 07:58, 12 November 2022 (UTC)" --But he caviled into getting his way and reverted it AGAIN without any input from secretname101. Secretname101 still does not feel the lead is correct, and for good reason. sideman "acts" like he's a moderator/admin and that's why the person who reported wes sideman on admin EdJohnstons talk page was confused. Thank You.

209.10.150.34 (talk) 17:18, 12 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I want to note that this submission is a mischaracterization (their behavior with me has not been edit warring at all, it’s been collaborative discussion if anything).
 * and I want to note that this seems to be submitted by a blocked user who has been frequently using different IP addresses to evade their block. SecretName101 (talk) 22:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)