User talk:209.104.232.243

May 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gene therapy for color blindness. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TwoTwoHello (talk) 17:56, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Anti-lynching movement has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:52, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Anti-lynching movement was changed by 209.104.232.243 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918149 on 2018-05-25T13:52:51+00:00.

June 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Parliament has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:34, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Parliament was changed by 209.104.232.243 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954622 on 2018-06-12T17:34:13+00:00.

June 2019
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Richard Oakes (activist)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:39, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Oakes (activist). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MrClog (talk) 17:12, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Oakes (activist), you may be blocked from editing. MrClog (talk) 17:27, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Dennis Banks, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. MrClog (talk) 17:28, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Oakes (activist). MrClog (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:33, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello, I'm Ormewood. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to List of the most popular names in the 1930s in the United States have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Ormewood (talk) 22:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)