User talk:209.122.225.241

“The Proposition”, led by Kreppel, played The Studio Arena Theater, a professional regional theater in Buffalo NY in June, 1972. In his June 1st review in The Buffalo Evening News, critic Anthony Bannon wrote that the “Proposition” performance was: “...a lot like diving off a high board or trapeze, ...(T)heir work gives an audience that sense of freedom.”  Bannon continued: “ Each time they begin a new sequence they are in a make-it-or-Break-it situation; once started there’s no going back. What’s great -wonderful- is that they get through it and with such good, creatively intelligent fun, playing on words, ideas, or mock poses instantly discovered.”

Recent edit to Deborah J. Glick
Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Deborah J. Glick), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 04:25, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

June 2019
Hello, I'm ToBeFree. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Carl McCall, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bob Inglis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Warpaltarpers (talk) 17:35, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2019
Hello, I'm Zinnober9. An edit that you recently made to 2019 Louisiana gubernatorial election seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Zinnober9 (talk) 04:41, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019
Hello, I'm Rhododendrites. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Endorsements in the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 04:31, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2020
I wanted to let you know that political endorsements must meet all three of these criteria:
 * 1) The endorser must have an article or be unquestionably entitled to one
 * 2) This endorsement must be covered by reliable and independent sources
 * 3) Coverage of the endorsement needs to use the word endorse, or other closely related synonym.

This is covered by the consensus at WP:ERFC.

For that reason, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, poker websites, and blogs are not acceptable sources. Also, donating to a campaign or showing up to a campaign rally are not endorsements. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you - MrX 🖋 17:40, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2020
Hello, I'm Thepenguin9. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Roaring Twenties—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  Thepenguin9 (talk''') 22:17, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello, I'm Stanglavine. An edit you recently made to United States fiscal cliff seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rafael (stanglavine) msg 19:59, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Scottish inventions and discoveries. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Megan Barris  (Lets talk📧)  21:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions&#32;to Scottish inventions and discoveries, but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Megan Barris  (Lets talk📧)  21:05, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm JPxG. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Bruce Poliquin have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. jp×g 04:34, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2021
Hello, I'm Love of Corey. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Ann Kirkpatrick have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Love of Corey (talk) 00:27, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Daylight saving time. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 5a5ha seven (talk &#124; contribs) 22:03, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at 2021 New York City Council election, you may be blocked from editing. ''Flagrant puffery in George Takei's endorsement was not even close to acceptable, plain fact description. You've been around a long time and have been making a lot of edits that violate MOS or NPOV so this is a level 3 warning combining a lot of non-specific edits that have had to be undone on NYC/S political articles with you not getting the hint from myself and other editors. Next instance will be escalated.'' JesseRafe (talk) 12:51, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at 2021 New York City Council election. '' You've been told MANY times to stop sourcing incorrectly. You've added the Schulman links, probably a half dozen times at this point. Do you have a COI? Next iteration will result in a report, you've been warned formally and informally (via edit summaries) more than enough.'' JesseRafe (talk) 17:13, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at 2021 New York City borough president elections. It's been three weeks since last warning, so one more chance, but next will just be straight to a report. JesseRafe (talk) 12:29, 26 May 2021 (UTC)