User talk:209.141.121.110

April 2018
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Incidents at SeaWorld parks have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 16:42, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:Multiyear ranking of most viewed pages. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:44, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello, I'm Classicwiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Stroopwafel have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 20:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Townshend Acts. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Tom (North Shoreman) (talk) 18:45, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2019
Hello, I'm Cymru.lass. I noticed that you recently removed content from Maus without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 20:47, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Great Storm of 1987. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jeb3 Talk at me here  14:52, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Great Storm of 1987, you may be blocked from editing. Jeb3 Talk at me here  14:54, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Harriet Beecher Stowe. CLCStudent (talk) 17:08, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Province of New York. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ComplexRational (talk) 20:10, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Province of New Hampshire, you may be blocked from editing.  Everedux  (talk)  21:05, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Province of New Hampshire.  Everedux  (talk)  21:06, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

February 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Education in Mexico. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Poydoo (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2020
Hello, I'm Thepenguin9. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Christian mission—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  Thepenguin9 (talk''') 22:54, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, I'm RacoonyRE. I noticed that in this edit to Idaho Falls, Idaho, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Racoony RE  Message meContributions 15:30, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:MeismeAnimations
Hello, 209.141.121.110. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MeismeAnimations, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, I'm Seahawks4Life. I noticed that you recently removed content from Artifact (archaeology) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Seahawks 4 Life TALK—CONTRIBS 17:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:MeismeAnimations


Hello, 209.141.121.110. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "MeismeAnimations".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:03, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Russian Wikipedia—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:37, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Idaho. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.   — LauritzT (talk) 18:13, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rhode Island, you may be blocked from editing. Agent00x (talk) 18:19, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at GEICO. LizardJr8 (talk) 18:32, 17 September 2021 (UTC)