User talk:209.147.192.21

SmackallBot 14:59, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Warning
Do not remove interwiki links. That is considered vandalism. Leave them and add others if you want. --  Szvest   -  Wiki me up ®  18:13, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

February 2008
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.-  Ro   Bo   Tam   ice 15:49, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 20:33, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your edits to September 21
Dear 209.147.192.21, Some of your [ edits] on the page September 21 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:
 * The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. Please see this page for help. PseudoBot (talk) 13:43, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Kazakhs
This edit was unreferenced, if you have a relevant sources please provide it. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 18:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Davy Jones' Locker has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Cutno (talk) 02:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. ElKevbo (talk) 21:33, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 31 hours, for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Dreadstar ☥  20:59, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. 5 albert square (talk) 22:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

June 2011
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Latin America. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 16:03, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

October 2011
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Charles D. Walker, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:17, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

November 2011
Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Glane23. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to John Dewey with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Geoff Who, me?  01:30, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --   Luke      (Talk)   01:47, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Anna Faris with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Geoff Who, me?  01:50, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

April 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Phi Beta Sigma, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Sha-256 (talk) 10:57, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

November 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Columbus Day. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. no accident since you made 3 vandalism edits to the same article. Fyunck(click) (talk) 06:19, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2015
Hello, I'm Padenton. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Jussie Smollett— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Padenton (talk) 18:51, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Hello, I'm BU Rob13. I noticed that you recently removed some content from The Troubles with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ RobTalk 01:12, 1 September 2015 (UTC)