User talk:209.150.60.160

Edit
Would you share phrasing that you feel is neutral and addresses your concern? I think a primary source from the author himself should be good enough as a source. ZephyrListens1988 (talk) 23:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The issue is not neutral phrasing, but the rules of poor sourcing and biographies of living persons (particularly edits that might be considered libelous). You also appear to have created your account today for the purpose of repeatedly editing this particular article, which is why multiple editors have raised vandalism and edit war concerns. 209.150.60.160 (talk) 23:36, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Do you deem the source on the author's own website poor sourcing? What I am doing in my edit is repeating what he wrote on the subject himself. It feels relevant because he's a public figure and it is a massive social historical event. ZephyrListens1988 (talk) 23:43, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm open to any recommendations you might make for this edit. ZephyrListens1988 (talk) 23:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)