User talk:209.162.18.52

September 2013
This is your last warning. The next time you add defamatory content, as you did at Cory Booker, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 23:04, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Nothing I did was "defamatory." I added a citation needed tag to references that are dubious and do not have citations.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Cory Booker, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''If you've even read (which I don't think you have), everything mentioned in the lede is cited within the article, citations do not belong in the lede. This is your final warning. Also, don't edit other peoples user pages.'' Grammarxxx (What'd I do this time?) 23:15, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent editing history at Cory Booker shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. PrairieKid (talk) 23:16, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * If you revert an edit again, I will be forced to start a discussion on the Administrators board. You have already broken The 3-revert rule, which is punishable by a block. However, due to your unfamiliarity with WP and the minor change the edits have made, I have refrained. DO NOT revert again. PrairieKid (talk) 23:26, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Everything you said was uncited is in the Tenure section. Read it before reverting! PrairieKid (talk) 23:27, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. PrairieKid (talk) 23:36, 7 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I began a discussion at the Booker talk page and the link above. (2 discussions... One at the administrator's noticeboard discussing possible vandalism and the other at Booker's talk page about the actaul edits.) You could have broken the 3-revert rule, meaning it is likely that you face an editing block. PrairieKid (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:41, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:24, 8 September 2013 (UTC)


 * That's just, like, your opinion, man. The Dude/209.162.18.52 (talk) 05:38, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Thomas M. Cooley Law School without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 03:44, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Please read the sentences. If you need an explanation as to why they were deleted please consider refraining from any further edits of wikipedia.209.162.18.52 (talk) 17:26, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for attempting to harass other users, as you did at User talk:SMP0328.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. &mdash;Darkwind (talk) 12:44, 13 October 2013 (UTC)