User talk:209.171.88.155

March 2018
Hello, I'm MrX. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Armie Hammer, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! - MrX 🖋 18:58, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Armie Hammer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 19:01, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Armie Hammer. - MrX 🖋 19:02, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Roseneath has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:27, 6 July 2019 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Roseneath was changed by 209.171.88.155 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874007 on 2019-07-06T14:27:32+00:00

June 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Himmat Singh Shergill, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:27, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

February 2021
Hello, I'm Aseleste. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Michael van der Veen, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 07:49, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did with this edit to Michael van der Veen. Thank you. ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 07:54, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Lara Trump, you may be blocked from editing.   ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 06:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2022
Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Toronto Star—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:56, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello, I'm Frood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Criminal proceedings in the January 6 United States Capitol attack—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. – Frood (talk) 01:53, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been [ disallowed by an edit filter.] If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeatedly attempting to perform disruptive actions may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 02:46, 11 November 2023 (UTC)