User talk:209.18.49.62

October 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lemon shark. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.   Transcendental36 (talk) 15:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2021
Hello, I'm Dirkbb. I noticed that you recently removed content from Nazi salute without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dirkbb (talk) 22:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2021
Hello, I'm AeschyIus. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Analysis—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. aeschyIus (talk) 18:44, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to De Gruytters carillon book have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: De Gruytters carillon book was changed by 209.18.49.62 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975461 on 2021-06-25T16:45:29+00:00

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Contract. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.   IdreamofJeanie (talk) 17:22, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2022
Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to 1022—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:13, 1 June 2022 (UTC)