User talk:209.200.192.138

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, 209.200.192.138. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Creativity (religion), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 20:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

There is no conflict of interest as I am not contributing to articles about myself, my family, friends, company, organization or competitors. However, it would seem that various people who edit the pages are "competitors" with the religious group at hand.209.200.192.138 (talk)


 * Sure, whatever you say, boss. You have been adding, for weeks or more, trivial promotional details about these groups. Including vapid quotes or tid-bits to unduly implies a level of significance which is not supported by neutral, reliable sources. Wikipedia isn't a platform for promotion or advocacy, and coverage of topics should be proportional to reliable sources. Discuss proposed changed on the specific article's talk page. Grayfell (talk) 20:43, 26 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Your comment comes off as discriminatory and hate-based asserting "trivial promotional details" to "these groups", the meaning of which is unclear. Please try leaving your personal opinions and feelings out of editing on Wikipedia.209.200.192.138 (talk)

December 2017
Your recent editing history at Creativity (religion) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Grayfell (talk) 20:48, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.