User talk:209.222.162.146

October 2021
Hello, I'm Discospinster. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Grand Detour, Illinois—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ... disco spinster   talk  19:36, 24 October 2021 (UTC)


 * I have no idea what the edit was. I haven't even heard of Grand Detour, Illinois until I read this. I'm bewildered as to who would have used this IP to make those changes as it's me (52 y/o female), my mother (71) and my grandson (10) who have access to it and as far as I know my mother isn't interested in Wikipedia and unless it's PS4 related my grandson won't care. I checked out the page and it's not familiar in the least nor could I possibly provide any information related to the subject. As you can see by the timing of my reply, I'm rarely even logged into Wikipedia. SteampunkSniper (talk) 17:22, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Grand Detour, Illinois. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DigitalChutney (talk) 19:38, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Grand Detour, Illinois, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Grand Detour, Illinois was changed by 209.222.162.146 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953607 on 2021-10-24T19:39:36+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Uranium Site (talk) 19:40, 24 October 2021 (UTC)