User talk:209.242.148.242

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Saint Patrick. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. KurtRaschke 22:13, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  Durova  21:25, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

September 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Larry King has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. LeaveSleaves (talk) 17:28, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

March 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Mama Quilla has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. BarretBonden (talk) 17:03, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Elizabethan era. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Old Moonraker (talk) 16:04, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page St. Augustine High School (San Diego, California) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 17:41, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Paris-Charles de Gaulle Airport, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Paris-Charles de Gaulle Airport was changed by 209.242.148.242 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-03-30T17:43:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 17:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2011
This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at badminton, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Aleen f 1 15:55, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Matthew Goode with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mephistophelian (talk) 16:32, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

September 2012
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Annie John, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  City O f  Silver  17:59, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Vianello (Talk) 18:07, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2012
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Annie John was changed by 209.242.148.242 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.903227 on 2012-09-21T17:15:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:15, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

October 2012
Hello, I'm Velella. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks,  Velella  Velella Talk 18:40, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions was changed by 209.242.148.242 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908867 on 2012-10-24T18:41:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:41, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Supreme Court of the United States. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 19:36, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Samuel Beckett, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 21:07, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

May 2013
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Hydrocarbon, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:19, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm Fluffernutter. I noticed that you recently made an edit to A Wrinkle in Time that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 18:45, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The World of Islam concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The World of Islam, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The World of Islam


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. &mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 17:57, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Joyce Beatty, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a &#123;&#123;Talkback&#125;&#125; message on my talk page. @ 20:45, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Hello, I'm Tutelary. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Stockholm syndrome— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tutelary (talk) 20:53, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

March 2015
Hello, I'm Sideways713. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Uganda because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Sideways713 (talk) 20:27, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2015
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Religious images in Christian theology because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 16:37, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2015
Hello, I'm Elizium23. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to The Academy of Our Lady of Peace because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 21:24, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Portal:Ancient Rome/Intro. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 05:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

February 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. --Hipal (talk) 17:01, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. -Filmssssssssssss (talk) 18:42, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

March 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Politics of Cuba—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 22:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)