User talk:209.251.255.73

January 2021
Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Alliant Credit Union, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.    Ashley  yoursmile!  17:15, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Why does that need a reliable source? The law (common knowledge, published regulatory guidelines/thresholds) states that when an institution is over $10 billion it automatically becomes regulated by the CFPB. Public knowledge; industry standard.

September 2022
Hello, I'm ButterCashier. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sunny Hostin seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 14:44, 21 September 2022 (UTC)


 * While the edit may have subjectively "seemed" less than neutral to you - it is objectively and factually accurate. Accurate stating of facts is neutral in nature - as it is purely factual. The direct statement of facts cannot be anything less than neutral.  Therefor, the edit will be restored, and if you desire to press the issue and ignore WP:NOTOPINION in utilization your subjective perspective, then I will present a laundry list of cites from WP:RS into the article to cement the objective and factual statement I added to the article. Sorry if it goes against your WP:OPINION, but that's not how WP operates. 12.161.138.11 (talk) 14:59, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Sunny Hostin. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ButterCashier (talk) 15:05, 21 September 2022 (UTC)


 * You need to read my previous response. YOUR reverting of the edit I made is what actually violates WP:NPOV by removing proven, citable statements of fact. If you continue to utilize this tactic in your reverts and issuing inappropriate warnings, you conduct will be submitted WP:AR for disciplinary action against your account. You did get one thing correct however - your notices are irrelevant.  209.251.255.73 (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi. Thanks for writing to me concerning your edit on the Sunny Hostin page. The use of the word "hypocritical" seemed less than neutral to me, but I could be mistaken. If you can provide a reliable source to confirm this view, it would have no reason to be reverted. The word "hypocritical" could be considered a personal attack which is not allowed, especially on the page of a living person. Hence, I think there ought to be a source to affirm your edit. Thanks. ButterCashier (talk) 15:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)