User talk:209.52.88.205

February 2016
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Trevor Cox (ice hockey), did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Fdssdf (talk) 23:21, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Dental assistant has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:46, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Dental assistant was changed by 209.52.88.205 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.881229 on 2016-04-22T04:46:44+00:00.

February 2018
Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sacha Baron Cohen have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 21:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at All Hail King Julien. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:25, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: All Hail King Julien was changed by 209.52.88.205 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2018-02-06T21:25:10+00:00.

November 2020
Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Global News: BC 1—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:05, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

October 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Killing of David Amess. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. The same goes with Kongsberg attack. Love of Corey (talk) 04:24, 17 October 2021 (UTC)