User talk:209.6.11.83

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leadership-as-Practice (December 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leadership-as-Practice and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Leadership-as-Practice, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Leadership-as-Practice Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rusalkii&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Leadership-as-Practice reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 20:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Leadership-as-Practice has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Leadership-as-Practice. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 13:49, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Leadership-as-Practice has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Leadership-as-Practice. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 12:36, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Leadership-as-Practice (June 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Leadership-as-Practice and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Leadership-as-Practice, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Leadership-as-Practice Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nightenbelle&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Leadership-as-Practice reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 13:58, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Work Self-Effacacy
You mentioned that people reviewing your draft of Leadership as Practice should look at other articles you've editied- specifically- Worker Self-Efficacy. I did. That article is a mess. Its as much an essay as the Leadership as Practice- needs a complete re-write. It also had huge chunks of copyvio- just because you cite a source, doesn't mean it can be directly copied from that source. You either have to use quotations marks (these should be sparing and occasional) or summarize content in your own words. So this article needs a complete work over- just like your draft. I would suggest you study the Manual of Style before you re-submit the article. Its not that editors are biased against you- its that the first thing reviewers do is look at what changes have happened since the last review- if we see none- there is no point in reviewing it. Please listen when editors give you advice. Don't get mad- get better. Nightenbelle (talk) 15:00, 1 July 2022 (UTC)