User talk:20spokesperson

November 2012
Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Final Destination 3 without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  18:12, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

February 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

So, after your weird remarks here, your first edits in four months and indicating you "must be unblocked" when you clearly were not blocked, I think you can see where that might look a little suspiscious. Upon looking further, it was clear that User:87Stone is another account you operate, and as you used it to edit some of the same articles as those you edited with this account, that is a clear violation of the policy on the use of multiple accounts, hence an indefinite block of that account and a timed block of this one.

However, that still leaves me wondering what those remarks at on that talk page were about since the other account I found was not blocked and, like this one, does not appear to have interacted witht the editor you were complaining about getting you blocked. So it seems there is at least one more out there. The best thing for you right now is to be honest, and let us know what other accounts you operate. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)


 * You need to go and request unblock over at that account and not here (and old accounts are never removed - they need to be kept for copyright attribution requirements). Also, as Beeblebrox pointed out above, it appears you had another account at the time you made that comment about being unblocked on Feb 18, as neither of the two we know about were blocked at the time. You will need to disclose *all* accounts you have used if you wish to be unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)