User talk:210.48.175.44

June 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Burger Rings has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:55, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Burger Rings was changed by 210.48.175.44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959243 on 2015-06-22T23:55:44+00:00.

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Burger Rings with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Winner 42 Talk to me!  00:07, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2015
Hello, I'm ErrantX. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Errant (chat!) 21:13, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Apollo program. Dual Freq (talk) 21:31, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. Neil N  talk to me 21:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

June 2016
Hello, I'm Vensco. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to HMS Cleopatra (33) has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Vensco (T | C) 23:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Vensco (T | C) 03:26, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talmud. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -glove- (talk) 22:23, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2016
Hello, I'm Eteethan. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Seventeen tantras— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  Ete ethan  (talk)  21:14, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

April 2018
Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to 12 Strong appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:49, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Toddy1. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Type 21 frigate that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 04:35, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Your edit to the article on the Type 21 frigate are not really supported by the citations your provided, except in details that are not particularly relevant to the thrust of your argument. Please see Talk:Type 21 frigate.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:10, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

June 2018
Hello, I'm Acroterion. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, USS Scorpion (SSN-589), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   00:35, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop refactoring comments that were made over a year ago. If you have something else to say, post it as a new comment, and add a signature block. Remember to put the new comment on a new line.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:16, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

July 2018
You refactored comments that were made over a year ago. You were asked not to. Your refactoring has been reverted because it is disruptive. If you have something else to say, post it as a new comment, and add a signature block. Remember to put the new comment on a new line.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:16, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

August 2018
Wikipedia is not your personal blog. Continually refactoring comments made years ago is disruptive. Please stop it. If you have something new to say, post it as a new comment at the bottom of the section.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:23, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

The item "COMPLAINTS ABOUT ANON WIKI EDITORS..." in Talk:HMS Royalist (89) will be manually archived on 18 August 2018. If you have new points to make, please create a new topic at Talk:HMS Royalist (89).-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:39, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a place for blogging or promotion. So please do not try to use Wikipedia to promote yourself or your family, band, product, or company, as you did at Talk:HMS Royalist (89). The subjects of our articles have to meet certain notability requirements and be written from a neutral point of view. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time, even if it's on your user page. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 05:37, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

September 2018
Thanks for making a new posting on Talk:HMS Royalist (89). This is much more useful than editing posts made years ago.

I hope you do not mind, but I deleted some stray spaces at the start of paragraphs. Wikipedia misinterprets them as mark-up.-- Toddy1 (talk) 05:11, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

December 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 21:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Carbon dioxide, you may be blocked from editing. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:13, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

November 2019
Wikipedia has a policy on verifiability.

In Wikipedia, verifiability means other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. This principle was previously expressed on this policy page as "the threshold for inclusion is verifiability, not truth". See the essay, WP:Verifiability, not truth. If reliable sources disagree, then maintain a neutral point of view and present what the various sources say, giving each side its due weight.

All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation that directly supports the material. Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed.

For how to write citations, see citing sources. Verifiability, no original research, and neutral point of view are Wikipedia's core content policies. They work together to determine content, so editors should understand the key points of all three. Articles must also comply with the copyright policy.

The content you added to the article on HMS Royalist (89) has been reverted because it did not meet these standards. Toddy1 (talk) 05:55, 11 November 2019 (UTC)