User talk:210.49.251.226

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Imagine Entertainment has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 03:30, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Do not add material to Amblin Entertainment without providing specific, reliable and verifiable references for them. I have protected that article from anonymous editing owing to the ongoing content dispute. If you think you have something to add to the debate about these movies, please do so on Talk:Amblin Entertainment. However as it stands consensus seems to be that the references you provided are insufficient and borderline original research. - Mark 03:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

And as for Imagine Entertainment, according to various sources the company was founded in 1986, not 1989 as you have indicated twice in your edit summaries. - Mark 03:54, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Eddie Murphy has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. \ / (⁂) 10:18, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Eddie Murphy constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. \ / (⁂) 10:19, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Eddie Murphy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. \ / (⁂) 10:22, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. -- The Red Pen of Doom  17:45, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on Chris Barrie worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Sceptre (talk) 04:00, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Chris Barrie has been reverted, as it introduced unsourced or poorly sourced negative or controversial biographical material. Please do not continue to add such information. Thank you. Sceptre (talk) 04:03, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced negative or controversial biographical material to pages, as you did with this edit to Tim McInnerny. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Sceptre (talk) 04:05, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

February 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page WWE Hall of Fame has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bmt547s_7lk). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:42, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
 * [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.   TJ   Spyke   05:50, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * No, it's because your only source is not allowed. YouTube is illegally hosting that copyrighted video, meaning you can't link to that video. See WP:RS.  TJ   Spyke   20:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Mark 00:45, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. — Moe   ε  03:45, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Blocked
A Checkuser by has confirmed that this IP address is the same as that used by indefinitely blocked. As a result, I have blocked it from editing for a nominal period of 3 months due to block evasion. - Mark 04:45, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.  TJ   Spyke   02:23, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.   TJ   Spyke   02:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Wizardman 23:15, 2 June 2009 (UTC)