User talk:210.50.229.102

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Erp (talk) 05:15, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

June 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Jihadism, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Remember: Wikipedia is not censored. GenoV84 (talk) 20:48, 6 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I removed a citation from one Sebastian Gorka. Gorka is a deeply partisan figure (a former member of the Trump administration no less) who is also associated with the Viktor Orban government in Hungary. His analysis is akin to punditry and as such I think it is inappropriate to present his work as informed or neutral commentary. Presumably, we would have to apply the same standard to, for example, his belief that the 2020 US election was rigged by Joe Biden or his unconventional views about the effectiveness of Ivermectin against covid if we are going to accept that he is a legitimate source. I think that would compromise the accuracy of wikipedia. His analysis should at least be presented in its proper context, as the opinion of a partisan pundit, rather than be allowed to masquerade as widely accepted truth. 210.50.229.102 (talk) 10:24, 7 June 2022 (UTC)