User talk:212.139.229.178

September 2019
Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Thermosetting polymer— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 09:16, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Thermosetting polymer. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DVdm (talk) 09:18, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Thermosetting polymer, you may be blocked from editing. DVdm (talk) 09:18, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Thermosetting polymer. DVdm (talk) 09:19, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 09:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding  below. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 09:07, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Notification: Blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding  below. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 12:05, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
Hello, I'm Nyook. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Reinhard Heydrich have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Nyook  ✉ 11:34, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Reinhard Heydrich. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 11:35, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Reinhard Heydrich, you may be blocked from editing. Nyook  ✉ 11:38, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Reinhard Heydrich. Serols (talk) 11:38, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:01, 4 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Peter Jones (entrepreneur)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 13:46, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Peter Jones (entrepreneur).   Transcendental36 (talk) 13:50, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year to prevent further vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --   LuK3      (Talk)   14:03, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

November 2021
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Talk:Dwayne Johnson, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.   ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:50, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Louis Comfort Tiffany. KylieTastic (talk) 15:58, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Charles Rennie Mackintosh have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:05, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Charles Rennie Mackintosh was changed by 212.139.229.178 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.873418 on 2021-11-12T15:05:12+00:00

December 2023
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bobby Kellard—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 11:34, 11 December 2023 (UTC)