User talk:212.219.220.108

University of Nottingham
Dear Anonymous User, Please do not attempt to smear me, an experienced WP editor of 6 years as a vandal. Your edits make this article look like a promotional advert for the UoN. "Peacockery" is an entirely sensible term for your edits. Famous dog   (c) 12:45, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Say whatever bullsh*t you want, you lot were penises, I'm not going to be civil or flexible any more until you are. I WILL wreck wikipedia. Might be months, might be years from now, but if you lot carry on it WILL happen. Then you'll all take to forums complaining about how you wish you'd taken me seriously.

It's pretty feckin simple: 1. Agree to stop wrecking my well-researched and well-referenced contributions. 2. When I post them, if you have a problem, tell me and I'll address it. That's it. Cue you peacocking again. And cue me eventually wrecking wikipedia because of it. 212.219.220.108 (talk) 17:26, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Hello, I'm Some jerk on the Internet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Mehmet Oz because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=584218239 here]. --some jerk on the Internet   (talk)  15:37, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mehmet Oz with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. &mdash; MusikAnimal talk 17:31, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Mehmet Oz with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.   Wikipelli Talk   17:31, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Mehmet Oz, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 17:35, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Hey coont, I used well-referenced sources that took me fecking ages to find and to compile the paragraph in line with wikipedia policy and you circumfetish Nazis kept deleting it instead of tagging it so I could improve it. So go feck yourself, I will find ways around whatever blocks you try. And I will eventually wreck wikipedia. I hold grudges until I've got revenge or justice, whichever comes first 212.219.220.108 (talk) 17:38, 2 December 2013 (UTC).

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 17:40, 2 December 2013 (UTC)