User talk:212.219.7.3

May 2014
Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Volkswagen Up because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 10:14, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Airbus A350 XWB. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wolbo (talk) 08:20, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2014
Hello, I'm Twsx. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Tariq Iqbal with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 08:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Air data computer with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ~ | twsx | talkcont | ~ 09:00, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Barista, you may be blocked from editing. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 10:43, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:44, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Airbus A350 XWB. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Wolbo (talk) 08:31, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Warsangali, you may be blocked from editing. Wolbo (talk) 08:32, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to List of programming languages for artificial intelligence. PhilKnight (talk) 10:56, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:42, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

October 2018
Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to EBay— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 13:50, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to National Sea Life Centre (Birmingham). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 09:15, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Sweeney (name). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. – Gilliam (talk) 11:49, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2021
Hello, I'm AssumeGoodWraith. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk | contribs)  10:27, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please do not make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at File Transfer Protocol. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in a block from editing.   – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk | contribs)  10:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Hello, I'm LuK3. I noticed that you recently removed content from Women in war without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --   LuK3      (Talk)   13:23, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Help:IPA/Latin, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 14:37, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Sayyid, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. SlySabre (talk) 13:08, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bear versus bull
Hello, 212.219.7.3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bear versus bull, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello, I'm Adakiko. An edit you recently made to Power supply seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 09:47, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jarvis v Swans Tours Ltd. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ (talk) 11:40, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Hello, I'm ButterCashier. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to St Martin in the Bull Ring have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ButterCashier (talk) 14:31, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Edits on November 4th, 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Bahria Town, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Sam Walczak  Talk / Edits   15:15, 4 November 2022 (UTC)